Rebuilding trust in tax administration
- Enrico Tabag
- 1 day ago
- 4 min read
A STABLE and credible tax system is the backbone of any modern economy. For businesses, predictability, transparency and integrity in tax administration are not optional. In the Philippines, however, concerns over perceived irregularities in tax audits, particularly those involving the issuance and enforcement of letters of authority (LOAs), have reignited long-standing calls for deep reforms within the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR).
These concerns have reached the halls of the Senate. In recent weeks, Senators Raffy Tulfo and Jinggoy Estrada have publicly urged the government to investigate alleged abuses linked to LOAs. Senator Tulfo has cited reports from business owners who claim they were subjected to questionable or excessive audit practices. Senator Estrada, likewise, voiced alarm over accounts of taxpayers feeling misled, pressured or compelled to accede to unofficial “arrangements” during audits.
If even a fraction of the allegations are true, they threaten to erode public confidence in the country’s tax system — an outcome the Philippines can ill afford at a time when investment competition in the region is more intense than ever.
As public practitioners working closely with taxpayers, we often hear the frustrations of business leaders, executives and especially foreign investors, who struggle to understand the Philippine tax environment. Their concerns extend beyond statutory tax rates. They revolve around the complexity of rules, inconsistent implementation and unpredictability of audit enforcement. What one revenue district considers acceptable may trigger findings in another. What one examiner considers compliant may be disputed by another.
In many client engagements, these frustrations are expressed bluntly. Foreign investors accustomed to automated, rule-based and uniform tax systems frequently ask why similar taxpayers across the Philippines may receive vastly different treatment. As one executive remarked during a recent forum: “You cannot plan operations if you cannot predict how tax laws will be enforced.”
These perceptions — whether fully accurate or not — shape investor sentiment. They also influence long-term decisions about expansion, divestment or relocation.
Adding to the unease is the persistent belief that BIR examiners receive commissions or incentives based on audit collections. Whether true or not, the impact is the same: taxpayers who believe examiners are financially motivated to raise assessments tend to view audits as revenue-driven rather than law-driven. This fuels distrust, heightens anxiety and reinforces the impression that audits are adversarial exercises instead of corrective or educational processes.
Much of the current scrutiny focuses on how LOAs are issued, implemented and monitored. The LOA itself is a lawful and necessary tool empowering the BIR to examine the books of taxpayers. The concerns arise when LOAs are allegedly issued without clear basis, are overly broad in scope, or are followed by unofficial negotiations that place taxpayers in a vulnerable position. If validated, these practices weaken the pillars of fairness, integrity and predictability — pillars that any successful tax administration must uphold.
Lawmakers and tax experts have proposed reforms including:
– Stricter time limits on LOA validity to prevent perpetual or overlapping audits.
– A requirement for specific audit issues to be identified before an LOA is issued.
– System-generated or electronic LOAs to reduce human discretion.
– Stronger administrative and criminal penalties for examiners proven to abuse their authority.
– Taxpayer feedback or rating mechanisms to evaluate the conduct of audit teams.
These proposals align with broader modernization initiatives — e-audits, automated risk scoring and online dispute resolution — designed to reduce face-to-face interactions and minimize opportunities for abuse or misinterpretation.
It is important to underscore that the BIR is not defined by allegations against a minority. It is staffed by thousands of committed professionals who work diligently and honorably to secure government revenues. However, even unproven accusations can cast long shadows. Perceptions matter. Trust matters even more. As long as doubts persist, they affect not just taxpayers but the overall business climate.
To attract long-term, high-quality investment, the Philippines must offer more than incentives. It must offer assurance. A tax system that is consistent, transparent and free from corruption sends a powerful message: that businesses can operate here with confidence and that the rule of law — not discretion — governs enforcement.
Encouragingly, there are signs of movement. The newly appointed BIR commissioner recently announced a temporary freeze on the issuance of LOAs while the agency reviews and tightens its audit protocols. This step, though disruptive in the short term, is a clear acknowledgment that reforms are necessary. More importantly, it signals a willingness to confront systemic issues head-on.
Still, the public will be watching closely. Reforms must be genuine, sustained and insulated from political theater. The freeze must not be a mere publicity gesture, but a prelude to structural change that restores confidence — both for taxpayers at home and investors abroad.
As the country stands at a critical juncture, the new BIR leadership deserves both support and encouragement. We wish it success in its mission to rebuild credibility, enforce ethical discipline and restore public trust. For our part, public practitioners remain committed to supporting measures that strengthen accountability, modernize audit systems and uphold the rule of law. The accounting, legal and tax communities share a common goal with the government: to cultivate a tax environment that is fair, predictable and corruption-free.
For the Philippines to secure lasting economic growth, it must nurture institutions that investors can rely on. We look forward to seeing a BIR that is strong, dynamic, fair, transparent and trusted.
At a time when the Philippines seeks to solidify its position in the global economy, we cannot afford a tax system clouded by doubt. Rebuilding trust in tax administration is more than an institutional aspiration — it is a national imperative.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico D. Tabag is the managing partner of EDT & Co., CPAs and an assistant professor at the University of Santo Tomas Alfredo M. Velayo College of Accountancy. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of these institutions.
Comments